Om Jeet Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23184 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2025 Thana- NARAINPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Om Jeet Chaudhary Son of Dhanai Chaudhary Resident of Village - Pharana, P.S. - SBarhara, Distt. - Bhojpur.

2.

Mantu Chaudhary Son of Mohan Chaudhary Resident of Village - Kajichak, Ward no. 7, P.S. - Koilwar, Distt. - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 10-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 68 of 2025 in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 113(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution story, on 10.07.2025, near Baruna Petrol Pump, the informant and her husband were intercepted by the petitioners along with two miscreants. The accused allegedly assaulted them with an iron rod, snatched the informant's mangalsutra and fled away after threatening the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is delay of one day in lodging of the first information report and the allegations of assault with iron rod etc. upon the petitioners, are

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23184 of 2026(2) dt.10-04-2026 2/2 not correct and they have been falsely implicated in the present case on the ground that there is a dispute between the parties as the petitioner no. 1 happens to be the informant's brother-in-law. The injury report (Annexure-2) also indicates that the injury suffered by Sunita Devi are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt object. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the dispute between the parties and simple nature of injuries, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 68 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) priyanka/- U T