Raushan Kumar @ Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32393 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-505 Year-2020 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== RAUSHAN KUMAR @ PAPPU YADAV S/O Maheshwar Ray Resident of Village - Vikrampur Bandey, P.S. - Samastipur (Muffasil), District - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mahendra Pratap For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case no. 505 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 5.1.2021, is person with clean antecedent and charge sheet has been submitted. Further it is submitted that the deceased committed suicide as she felt humiliated as her brother-in-law (Jija ji) had taken loan from the petitioner and when they had gone to seek money back on account of which deceased felt ashamed and she committed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32393 of 2021(3) dt.23-12-2021 2/2 suicide but the informant with ulterior motive instituted the present case that his sister was killed by the petitioner and his family members for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has a child aged about two years who is staying with the family of the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that case of suicide has been given a colour of killing for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry when the marriage was five years old.

Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts that petitioner has a child aged two years will become helpless in absence of his father as his mother is no more to take care, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate II, Samastipur in Muffasil P.S. Case no. 505 of 2020. (Satyavrat Verma, J) s.hassan/- U T