Premchandra Jaiswal @ Santosh Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22525 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2019 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

PREMCHANDRA JAISWAL @ SANTOSH CHOUDHARY Son of Bhagwan Choudhary @ Bhagwan Prasad Choudhary Resident of Village - Dharmpatti, P.S. Raghopur, Distt - Supaull.

2.

Manish Anand @ Guddu Sah Son of Ramchandra Sah @ Ramchandra Prasad Resident of Village - Dharmpatti, P.S. Raghopur, Distt - Supaull. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 16-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners in the present case are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 14 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on perusal of the first information report it would appear that thrust of the allegation is against one Bajrang Poddar with whom the Natini of the informant had gone away and the informant has alleged that she had taken away at least one lakh cash, 10 bhar gold and 20 bhar silver ornaments. It is, thus, submitted that the Natini of the informant seems to have gone on her own with Bajrang Poddar.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22525 of 2019(4) dt.16-07-2019 2/2 While lodging the first information report, the petitioners have also been implicated because they happened to be loyal to one Pramod Mukhiya with whom the informant is having enmity. Learned APP for the State has upon perusal of the records submitted before this Court that the main allegation is against Bajrang Poddar and there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. The petitioners are also not having any criminal antecedent.

In the given facts and circumstances of the case, considering that the thrust of the allegation is against co-accused and there are no specific allegations against these petitioners as also the nature of accusations made by the informant against his own Natini, let the petitioners above named, in case of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 14 of 2019, be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (fifteen thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Birpur, Supaul, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T