← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23033/2025bail granted

Tej Narayan Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-12Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22265 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2023 Thana- NTPC KHAIRA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Prabhakar Kumar @ Prabhakar Kumar Singh @ Prabhakar Singh @ Laddu Singh S/O Harendra Singh R/O Vill.- Dhawan, P.S.- Bikramganj, Dist.- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with N.T.P.C. Khaira P.S. Case No. 108 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution story, on 05.12.2023 at 5:00 P.M., the petitioner and the co-accused Lankesh Kumar, came at the house of the informant and the petitioner fired at the informant which hit his abdomen and he fell down. It is alleged that the said occurrence took place because the brother of the informant Harendra Singh got mutated the share of the land of the informant in favour of his two sons, namely, Prabhakar

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22265 of 2025(3) dt.12-05-2025 2/2 Singh and Lankesh Singh.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that the informant and the accused persons are own gotiyas and the petitioner is in custody since 3.1.2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having regard to the specific allegation that this petitioner shot at the victim on his abdomen and the injured who is himself the informant in this case, died later on, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U