Ranjeet Kumar Tiwari v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6432 of 2022 ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar Tiwari son of Sri Amir Tiwari, Junior Engineer (Drawing), East Central Railway, Goraul, District- Vaishali, Resident of Vill/ PostBishundattpur, District- Muzaffarpur (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India Through the General Manage, East Central Railway, Hajipur, P.O.- Digghi Kalan, P.S.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur, Pin Code- 844101 (Bihar).

2.

The General Manager (Personnel), East Central Railway, Hajipur, P.O.- Digghi Kalan, P.S.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur, Pin Code- 844101 (Bihar).

3.

The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Sonepur, P.O.- Sonepur, District- Saran- 841101 (Bihar), 4.

The Senior Divisional, Personnel Officer, East Central Railway Sonepur, P.O.- Sonepur, District- Saran- 848101 (Bihar). 5.

The Senior Divisional Engineer (Co-Ordination), East Central Railway Sonepur, P.O.- Sonepur, District- Saran- 848101 (Bihar). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Munna Pd Dixit (M.P. Dixit), Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Radhika Raman, CGC Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Sr Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 10-05-2022 The petitioner, in the present writ application, is aggrieved by an order dated 07.04.2022 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, whereby an ex parte interim relief sought by the petitioner during the pendency of OA No. 050/00148 of 2022 filed by the petitioner, has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.6432 of 2022(2) dt.10-05-2022 2/2 refused, while issuing notice to the concerned respondents before the Tribunal.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere with an order refusing the petitioner's prayer for grant of ex parte interim relief. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to pursue before the Tribunal expeditious disposal of the main application which is pending before the Tribunal.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ( Madhuresh Prasad, J) SUMIT/- U