Kumari Sangita v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6487 of 2022 ====================================================== Kumari Sangita Wife of Ramesh Kumar, resident of Village and P.O.-Bardiha Turki, Ward No.3, P.S.-Patepur, District-Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secrerary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, I.C.D.S., Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Deputy Director, Welfare, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 5.

The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 6.

The District Programme Officer, I.C.D.S., Vaishali at Hajipur. 7.

The Child Development Project officer, Patepur Block, District-Vaishali. 8.

The Civil Surgeon, Vaishali at Hajipur.

9.

Shanti Kumari Devi Wife of Ram Nandan Rai Resident of Village-Bardiha, Ward No.4, P.O.-Bardiha Turki, P.S.-Patepur, District-Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dharmendra Kumar Paswan, Advocate For the State :

Mr.S.K. Mandal (Sc3) Mr. Arjun Prasad, AC to SC-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-12-2023 1.

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "i) To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondent Authorities to conduct a medical test of the Respondent No. 9 to determine her age as the same has not been mentioned clearly in her certificates;

ii) To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction

Patna High Court CWJC No.6487 of 2022(2) dt.12-12-2023 2/2 in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent Authorities to restrain the Respondent No. 9 from filing cases against the Petitioner for the post of Anganwadi Sevika as the Petitioner was appointed after due process and after the termination of Respondent No. 9."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U