Vijay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29903 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2024 Thana- BANDHUWA KURAWA District- Banka ====================================================== Vijay Yadav S/o Doman Yadav R/o Village- Palar, P.S- Bandhua Kuraba, DistBanka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vibhakar Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bandhua Kurava P.S. Case No.70 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC.

3. According to the prosecution's case, on 28/06/2024 at about 05:00 PM, a quarrel broke out. During this time, the accused person's children used filthy, abusive language against the informant and assaulted the informant's son-in-law, Sanjay Yadav, with sticks (lathi and danda). When the informant's daughter came to rescue Sanjay Yadav, the accused assaulted Bhagwati Devi with fists and kicks. During the altercation, Kamal Yadav struck the informant's daughter on the head with a lathi, with the intention to cause death.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29903 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence; rather, he has been falsely implicated in this case due to local politics. It is further submitted that the dispute between the parties originated from a quarrel among the children of both sides, and there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, but only general and omnibus allegations. Learned counsel next submits that both parties are neighbour residing in the same village.

5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. From perusal of the FIR, it appears that the incident happened on the basis of quarrel amongst the children of both the parties and the petitioner is said to have assaulted Sanjay Yadav, son-in-law of the informant, which does not appear to have resulted in serious injury. The petitioner has clean antecedent. Under these circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29903 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Bandhua Kurava P.S. Case No.70 of 2024 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with following conditions:

(i) the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation/trial.

(ii) the learned Court would, however, verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the Court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, it is expected that the verification process would be done expeditiously without causing any delay. (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Prakash Narayan U T