Banarasi Rajbhar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30199 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAINPUR District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Banarasi Rajbhar S/o Ramjanam Rajbhar

2. Gautam Rajbhar S/o Banarasi Rajbhar All resident of Village- Bhaganda, P.S. Chainpur, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arbind Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 21-08-2017 Heard both sides.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Chainpur P.S. case No. 65 of 2017 under Section 307, 379 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant named the petitioners and one Parichhit Rajbhar and alleged that all the three accused persons assaulted the informant and his brother and snatched Rs. 10,000/- from the possession of brother of informant.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are shop keepers and they have falsely been implicated in the case but it appears that petitioners assaulted the informant and his brother and also snatched money. The opinion with regard

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30199 of 2017 (3) dt.21-08-2017 2/2 to nature of injuries is kept reserved.

Considering the nature of allegation made against the petitioners, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U T