Arjun Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21196 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2019 Thana- PATNA CITY CHOWK District- Patna ====================================================== Arjun Ray, S/o Dharmveer Ray, Resident of Saidabad, Ward No. 9, P.S.- Raghopur, Distt.- Vaishali (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tilak Sao, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Special Case No. 2145 of 2019 arising out of Chowk P.S. Case No. 96 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272,273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is recovery of 20 litres of beer from the possession of petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has not committed any offence and nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and has been implicated on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 26.02.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21196 of 2019(2) dt.04-04-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Patna, in connection with Special Case No. 2145 of 2019, arising out of Chowk P.S. Case No. 96 of 2019, subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) khushbu/- U T