Pradeep Singh @ Pardip Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25880 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2024 Thana- BIHPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Pradeep Singh @ Pardip Kumar Singh son of Late Sachhidanand Singh @ Sachidanand Singh @ Chhote Lal Singh Village- Sahouri Ps- Bihpur DistBhagalpur, R/o- Village- Jay Rampur Telghi Tola Ps- Bihpur Naugachia DistBhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 506/34 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act in connection with Bihpur P.S. Case No.39 of 2024.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant.
4. It is next submitted that petitioner is an Amin and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25880 of 2024(2) dt.08-05-2024 2/3 on 24.01.2024 he was measuring a land beside the land of the informant, on account of which a dispute arose. It is further alleged that thereafter the petitioner went to his house and brought his gun and fired on the informant, but the informant managed to save himself and thereafter, villagers gathered, hence the petitioner fled.
5. The learned counsel submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to measurement of land the instant occurrence is alleged to have taken place and in order give serious colour to the allegations, it has been alleged that petitioner fired, but then no one was injured.
6. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.
7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Ist, Naugachia in connection with Bihpur P.S. Case No.39 of 2024., subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25880 of 2024(2) dt.08-05-2024 3/3 conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T