Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1724/2019bail granted

Lalo Goshwami @ Lalu Gahuswami v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-18The Chief Justice-2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1724 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2018 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Lalo Goshwami @ Lalu Gahuswami, S/o- Gonu Goshwami, R/o- VillageSahuri, P.S.- Birpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Randhir Kumar No-1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 18-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Barauni P.S. Case No. 97 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

The other four co-accused, namely, Devendra Kumar Mahto, Kundan Kumar, Bambam Kumar and Bihari Kumar @ Bihari Singh have been granted bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court on 19-07-2018, 24-09-2018, 12-10-2018 and 01-112018 in Cr. Misc. Nos. 42235 of 2018, 43254 of 2018, 48839 of 2018 and 52317 of 2018 respectively. The bail orders are on record as Annexure-2.

In view of the submissions raised and the reasons given therein, the applicant is also entitled to bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1724 of 2019(2) dt.18-01-2019 2/2 Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Begusarai in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 97/2018, subject to the following conditions:

(1). Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2). Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds. (3). If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ) P.K.P./- U