Md. Samsuddin And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28611 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -61 Year- 2017 Thana -NAUHATTA District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Md. Samsuddin, Son of Md. Sakim.

2. Md. Azzo Alam, Son of Md. Taslim

3. Md. Taslim, son of Md. Sakim, All resident of Village- Hati Erazi Kathuar, Ward No. 5, P.S. Nauhatta (Darhar O.P.), Distt. Saharsa.

4. Rukhsana Khatoon, Wife of Md. Firoz, Resident of Village- Sihaul, P.S. Bihta, Distt. Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Harun Quareshi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 61 of 2017 for the offences instituted under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners is of committing murder of the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28611 of 2017 (2) dt.06-07-2017 2/2 allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioner no.1 is father-in-law of the deceased, petitioner no.2 is brother-in-law of the deceased, petitioner no.3 is cousin brother-in-law of the deceased and petitioner no.4 is the married sister-in-law of the deceased. They are separate in mess and property from the husband of the deceased. On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 61 of 2017 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Saharsa, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T