Ajit Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Additional Chief Secretary Revenue And Land Reforms
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.886 of 2026 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3966 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.
Ajit Kumar Singh S/o Bageshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of VillageSalempur, PO. Dadwa, P.S. and Anchal Goh, Sub Division- Daud Nagar, District-Aurangabad (Bihar).
2.
Vijay Kumar Singh, S/o Bageshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of VillageSalempur, P.O.- Dadwa, P.S. and Anchal Goh, Sub Division- Daud Nagar, District-Aurangabad (Bihar).
3.
Urmila Singh, W/o Anil Kumar Singh, Resident of Village-Salempur, P.O.- Dadwa, P.S. and Anchal Goh, Sub Division- Daud Nagar, DistrictAurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Magistrate cum Collector, Collectorate, District-Aurangabad, Bihar.
3.
The Additional Collector cum Additional District Magistrate, Collectorate, District- Aurangabad, Bihar.
4.
The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Daudnagar, District-Aurangabad, Bihar.
5.
The Circle Officer, Goh Circle, Sub-Division, Daud Nagar, DistrictAurangabad, Bihar. 6.
The Circle Officer, posted in year 2006-07 at Goh Circle, Sub-Division, Daud Nagar, District-Aurangabad, Bihar.
7.
Bipul Kumar Mishra, Sio Late Ramji Mishra, Resident of Village, P.O. and P.S.- Goh, Anchal- Goh, District- Aurangabad, Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Standing Counsel- 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 17-04-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for restoration of MJC No. 3966 of 2025 (file for restoration of
Patna High Court MJC No.886 of 2026(3) dt.17-04-2026 2/2 CWJC No. 11589 of 2025) which was dismissed for nonprosecution on 09.03.2026 and the same was confirmed and consigned by order dated 18.03.2026 for non-compliance of the order dated 06.02.2026.
3. In view of the statement made in paragraphs 6 to 8, the MJC No. 886 of 2026 is allowed.
4. The MJC No. 3966 of 2025 is restored to its original.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U