Raman Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32366 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2020 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani ====================================================== RAMAN SAHU S/o Jitan Sahu R/o village- Harishawara, Ward No.- 12, P.S.- Khajauli, Distt.- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties through virtual court proceedings.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Khajauli P.S. Case No.133 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(B), 379, 448, 380, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant on his head by means of farsa. When the mother of the informant came to save him, Krishna Kumar and Raman Sahu

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32366 of 2021(2) dt.27-01-2022 2/3 outraged the modesty of the mother of the informant. The petitioner and other accused persons also assaulted the father of the informant by means of lathi, danda and iron rod. The accused persons also snatched Mangalsutra from the neck of the mother of the informant. The accused persons also took away a box containing Rs.10,000/- and some papers.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is case and counter case between the parties and both sides sustained injuries. It is further submitted that the petitioner has also filed a case against the informant side. It is further submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court below within four weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned court below shall consider the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32366 of 2021(2) dt.27-01-2022 3/3 prayer for regular bail of the petitioner on the same day without being prejudiced from the order of this Court. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T