Bharat Dubey And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.380 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17379 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Bharat Dubey, S/O Sukhal Dubey, Resident Of Village- Jaitiya, Ward No. 17, Police Station- Chanpatiya, District- West Champaran At Bettiah.
2. Parwez Ahmad S/O Mohammad Qayum Resident Of Mohalla- Muohael Colony, Baswariya, Bettiah, District- West Champaran At Bettiah
3. Sheikh Nazrul Haque S/O Sheikh Maqdoom Baksh Resident Of Uttawahita, Post- Pokhariya, Police Station- Chanpatiya, District- West Champaran At Bettiah.
4. Mohammed Murtaza-1, S/O Sheikh Akil Resident Of VillageSaukatiya, Police Station- Manjhaulia, Ward No. 4, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Mr. Amarjeet Sinha, Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. Mr. Lallan Jha, the District Education Officer, West Champaran at Bettiah.
4. Mr. Rajmani Prasad Singh, Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary), Buddh Marg, Patna.
5. Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary), Budh Marg, Patna.
6. Mr. Faqrul Alam, Secretary, Governing Body Of Gulab Memorial Inter College, Bettiah, West Champaran.
7. Ijhar Hussain, Incharge Principal, Gulab Memorial Inter College, Bettiah, West Champaran .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate.
For the O.P/s :
Mr. Rewati Kr. Raman, AC to GP 31 For the B.S.E.B.
:
Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, Advocate.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The moment the Court would find that the payment of salary to the Vitt Rahit Institution of the petitioners has already been released and also paid in the year 2009, the ambit of this
Patna High Court MJC No.380 of 2014 (2) dt.08-05-2015 2/2 contempt application would come to an end.
The grievance highlighted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in place of 26 genuine employees, 99 persons have been paid or that the quantum of amount paid to the petitioners is not as per their expectations and, in fact, they have been lesser amount, can now only be raised by the petitioners before the appropriate forum/court, but then that cannot be made subject matter of this contempt application keeping in view the very limited direction issued by this Court in the connected writ application.
This Court, on perusal of the show cause reply filed by the opposite parties, in fact, is fully satisfied that the directions given in the order of this Court has been fully complied. With the aforementioned observation, this application is disposed of.
(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Sujit/- U