Rameshwar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16822 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Rameshwar Prasad Son of Late Sri Nivas Sharma Resident of Mohallah - East Mithila Colony, P.O. Bata Ganj, P.S. Digha Town & District - Patna ( Bihar ), Posted as Head Master - Cum - Drawing & Disbursing Officer, Jagtarani High School, Rampur Diyara, Maner, District - Patna ( Bihar ) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna ( Bihar )

3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna

4. The Joint Secretary, Department of Education, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna

5. The Director, Secondary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Buddha Marg, Patna

6. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna Intermediate Council Bhawan, Buddha Marg, Patna

7. The District Education Officer, Patna

8. The District Programme officer (Eastablishment), office of the District Education Officer, Patna

9. The Treasury officer, Danapur, District - Patna

10. The Accountant General (A & E), Mahalekhakar Bhawan, Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna

11. Sri Shashi Bhushan Ray, the District Education Officer, Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Munna Pd Dixit (M.P. Dixit), Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajesh Singh, GP16 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 30-09-2016 A counter affidavit is being filed. Let it be kept on record. Although a prayer is made by Mr. Ajay Kumar learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. M.P. Dixit learned counsel for the petitioner for adjournment but it is stated at the bar by Mr. S.K.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16822 of 2015 dt.30-09-2016 2/2 Ranjan learned A.C. to G.P.17 and Mr. L.P.K. Rajgrihar learned counsel for the Accountant General that the suspension order has since been revoked, the departmental proceedings have concluded in censure and necessary orders have also been issued for payment of admissible dues as well as retiral benefits.

In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the writ petition which is accordingly disposed of. The petitioner if so aggrieved by the order can take recourse to the remedy available in law. (Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- U