Sanjeet Kumar Bhardwaj @ Fuchchu Singh @ Sanjeet Bhardwaj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25548 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2024 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Sanjeet Kumar Bhardwaj @ Fuchchu Singh @ Sanjeet Bhardwaj S/o Late Surya Shekhar Sharma R/o Village- Jakarpura, P.S.- Surajgarha, DistrictLakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Adv.

Mrs.Vaishnavi Singh, Adv.

Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 309 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. The prosecution story, in short, is that the informant brought his ailing son to the clinic of the petitioner for treatment wherein the petitioner and his brother administered injection and medicine to the son of the informant, who died immediately. Thereafter, the petitioner closed the clinic and fled away.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He is a person of clean antecedent. Even if the case of the prosecution is assumed to be true to the extent that the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25548 of 2025(6) dt.08-10-2025 2/2 treated the ailing son of the informant, it may not be intention of the petitioner to kill the son of the informant rather it may be a case of medical negligence and therefore, it does not attract criminal liability.

5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 309 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T