Amlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23660 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-405 Year-2022 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

AMLESH KUMAR S/o- DINESH SINGH @ PURAN SINGH VillageKayampur PS- Khushrupur Dist- Patna 2.

Dinesh Singh @ Puran Singh @ Dinesh Prasad son of Late Shyam Babu Village- Kayampur PS- Khushrupur Dist- Patna 3.

Subodh Kumar son of Dinesh Singh @ Puran Singh Village- Kayampur PSKhushrupur Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bhola Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that while he was going to his field when the petitioners assaulted and abused him, thereafter it is alleged that petitioner no. 1 fired with his country made pistol but missed and thereafter petitioner no. 3 assaulted the informant with Khanti causing injury on head and petitioner no. 2 assaulted him with a lathi.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23660 of 2023(2) dt.17-07-2023 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that though it is alleged that petitioner no. 1 fired but then no injury was caused which amply demonstrates that the allegation of firing is exaggerated. It is further submitted that even the injury found on the informant is simple in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Khushrupur P.S. Case No. 405 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T