Suresh Kumar Singh @ Sonu Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28071 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -896 Year- 2012 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ======================================================

1. Suresh Kumar Singh @ Sonu Kumar Singh aged about 35 years, Son of Sri Hateshwar Singh, Resident of Village- Mahipura, Post Mahipura, P/S Jandaha, District- Vaishli.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Kumari Sudha Sinha, W/o Suresh Kr. Singh @ Sonu Singh Father of Gangadhar Singh, Village- Baikatpur, P.S.- Khusrupur, District- Patna. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Madhuri Lata ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 896 of 2012 for the offence instituted under Sections 498(A), 323 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of D.P. Act.

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28071 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and the counsel for the informant, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 896 of 2012 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Patna City, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T