Pulkit Kamat @ Pulkit Roy v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.77129 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2018 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani ====================================================== Pulkit Kamat @ Pulkit Roy Son of Choudhary Roy, Resident of VillageSuriyahi, P.S.-Phulparas, District-Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 17-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 302, 341, 120(B) and 201 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 171 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion as he is said to have been seen at the Burning Ghat at the time of cremation of body of the deceased girl. The thrust of accusation is against other co-accused and the petitioner merely happens to be a villager and in no way connected to the family of Deokant Kamat. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 171 of 2018, subject to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77129 of 2018(2) dt.17-01-2019 2/2 conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and with further conditions-- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) BT/Chandran U T