Rohit Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26653 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -710 Year- 2016 Thana -MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Rohit Kumar, son of Sri Ranjeet Kumar Kanth, resident of VillageDhiranpatti, P.S.- Bela, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Anubhuti Ityalam, wife of Sri Rohit Kumar, resident of MohallaDhiranpatti, P.S. Bela, District- Muzaffarpur presently residing at the house of her father namely Rakesh Kumar Tiwari, resident of Mohalla Tiwari Tola, Shivshankar Path, P.S. Mithanpura, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 710 of 2016, registered under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accusation is of torturing of the complainant by her husband and other in-laws due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and removing her along with her child from matrimonial house after snatching per personal belongings.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the joint prayer of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation Centre,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26653 of 2017 (4) dt.18-12-2017 2/2 Patna High Court, Patna for settlement of dispute between the petitioner and O.P. No.2, who are husband and wife, but mediation could not be succeeded due to misunderstanding of the O.P. No.2. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of O.P. No.2 submits that mediation could not be succeeded due to interference of the brother-in-law and sister in law of the petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M. East Muzaffarpur in connection with Compliant Case No. 710 of 2016, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T