Jogendra Das @ Upendra Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35684 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-424 Year-2020 Thana- BAJPATTI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

JOGENDRA DAS @ UPENDRA DAS Son of Late Dhyani Das @ Late Mehi Das Resident of Village - Bajpatti bakhari @ Bakhari Yusufpur, P.S.- Bajpatti, Distt.- Sitamarhi.

2.

RAGHU DAS @ RAGHUNANDAN DAS @ RAGHUNANDAN KUMAR Son of Jogendra Das @ Upendra Das Resident of Village - Bajpatti bakhari @ Bakhari Yusufpur, P.S.- Bajpatti, Distt.- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

Further, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the address column of the petitioners in course of the day.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is that they assaulted the informant by means of rod and tengari, due to which they sustained

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35684 of 2021(2) dt.16-05-2022 2/2 injuries on his head and left hand.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is a case and counter case between the parties. Free fight is alleged to have taken place. The injuries on the side of the accused persons have not been explained by the prosecution. The prosecution has not come with clean hands.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Pupri, Sitamarhi in connection with Bajpatti P.S. case No.424/20 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T