← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1140/2020withdrawn

Ramveer Singh, v. Amit Suhani, State Of Bihar

2026-03-12Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1140 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24477 of 2019 ====================================================== Ramveer Singh, Son of Late Bodh Narayan Singh, Resident of Ward No. 4, Village - Bariyarpur, P.S. and District Sitamarhi- 843302, presently posted as Clerk at District Education Officer, Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Amit Suhani, State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Deepak Kumar, Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative ReforReform, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

R.K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary, Department of Education Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Rekha Kumari, Director of Education, Bihar, Patna. 5.

Pankaj Kumar, Regional Deputy Director, Education, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

6.

Ramchandra Mandal, District Education Officer, Sitamarhi. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Apurva Kumar, AC to GA-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 12-03-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for initiation of a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willfully. deliberately and intentionally violated the order dated 4.2 2020 passed in CWJC No.

24477/2019 whereby writ application was

Patna High Court MJC No.1140 of 2020(3) dt.12-03-2026 2/2 disposed off with direction to the Respondent No. 5 to dispose off representation of the petitioner by speaking order and if found admissible dues be paid, the entire exercise be completed by Respondent No. 5 within the period of 3 months from the date of receipt/production of the copy of the order

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and as such he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.

4. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U