Bindi Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29329 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-814 Year-2022 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Bindi Devi S/o- Late Manohar Das Village- Katorwa Ps- Bodhgaya DistGaya 2.

Malti Devi @ Manti Devi wife of Mithlesh Das Village- Katorwa PsBodhgaya Dist- Gaya 3.

Kamlesh Das son of Late Manohar Das Village- Katorwa Ps- Bodhgaya Dist- Gaya 4.

Arti Devi wife of Arun Kumar Village- Dhibari Ps- Konch Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 05-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case no. 814 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Sections 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, informant's minor daughter went for tuition but she did not return. It is further alleged that tuition teacher (mithilesh Das) had abducted the victim girl for the purpose of marriage with her.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. She is mother of main accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29329 of 2024(3) dt.05-07-2024 2/2 (Mithilesh Das) and has no role in abduction of the victim girl. In fact, informant had abducted the petitioner's son and he threw him from the running train resulting into serious injury for which he was admitted in hospital for about a month and counter case was registered as Bodhgaya P.S. Case No. 288 of 2023.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case no. 814 of 2022, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U