Seema Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35710 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2021 Thana- KATRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== SEEMA DEVI W/o Pramod Das R/o village- Dargah, P.S.- Katra, DistrictMuzaffarpur Bihar ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Surendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302/34 and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

As per the prosecution case, petitioner and other accused persons are alleged to have engaged in the trade of illegal liquor. It is further alleged that two persons died due to consuming poisonous liquor sold by them.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. There is no substantive evidence to suggest the implication of this petitioner in the present case. Petitioner has claimed clean antecedent and she is in custody

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35710 of 2021(2) dt.14-09-2021 2/2 since 22.2.2021.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise Act, Muzaffarpur in Katra Police Station Case No. 30 of 2021 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T