Dr. Chinmay Prakash v. Shri Amrit Lal Meena, Chief Secretary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1240 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15856 of 2024 ====================================================== Dr. Chinmay Prakash S/o Shri Anil Prakash Resident of Mohalla- Jai Prabha Nagar, Majhaulia Road, P.S.-Kaji Mohemmadpur, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
Shri Amrit Lal Meena, Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna 2.
Dr. S. Siddharth, Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, New Secretariat, Patna 3.
Sri Ajay Yadav, The Director, Higher Education, Education Department, New Secretariat, Patna 4.
Dr. B Rajender, Additional Chief Secretary, General Administration Department, Patna, Bihar 5.
Sri Rajnish Kumar, Joint Secretary, General Administration Department, Patna, Bihar 6.
Sri Girish Kumar Chaudhary, Chairman, Bihar State University Service Commission, 8th Floor, Bihar School Examination Board, Academic Bhawan, Budh Marg, Patna 7.
Sri Nirmal Kumar, Secretary Bihar State University Service Commission, Budh Marg, Patna 8.
Joint Secretary cum-Examination Controller, Bihar State University Service Commission, Budh Marg, Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Shri Anurag Saurav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Shri AC to SC-7 For the BSUSC :
Shri Anjani Kumar, Sr. Advocate Shri Alok Kumar Rahi, Advocate Shri Rohan Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to SC-7 for the State and Shri Anjani Kumar, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Bihar State University Service Commission assisted by Shri Alok Kumar Rahi, learned Advocate and Shri Rohan Sinha, learned Advocate.
Patna High Court MJC No.1240 of 2025(4) dt.05-12-2025 2/2
2. After perusing the order passed in the writ application, the Court finds that the contempt application is misconceived, thus, is dismissed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U