Rambabu Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27443 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2024 Thana- CHACKMEHSI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Rambabu Sahni S/O Late Upendra Sahni Resident of Village- Bhagipati Hospitaln Chowk, P.S- Chakmehashi, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raja Ram Mishra, Adv.

For the informant : Mr. Rabish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Gaurav, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Chakmehashi P.S. Case No. 72 of 2024 dated 26.05.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 341, 323, 447, 302, 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have brutally assaulted the informant's brother with lathi and danda as a result of which the informant's brother got badly injured and in course of treatment at D.M.C. H., Darbhanga, he died.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27443 of 2025(2) dt.14-05-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the incident took place in night but no source of light has been stated in the fardbeyan to identify the person who assaulted the informant's brother. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.11.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Samastipur in connection with Chakmehashi P.S. Case No. 72 of 2024 with the condition :- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27443 of 2025(2) dt.14-05-2025 3/3 on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T