Ram Kishun Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23598 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1274 Year-2021 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Ram Kishun Sharma Son Of Late Vindeshwari Sharma R/O VillageHaraiya, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj 2.

Lilawati Devi Wife Of Ramkishun Sharma R/O Village- Haraiya, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Khushboo Sharma Wife Of Sunil Sharma @ Sunil Kumar Sharma R/O Village- Haraiya, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj At Present D/O Prabhu Sharma, R/O Village- Madhopur Khurd, P.S.- Tareya Sujan, DistrictKushinagar (u.p.) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are father-inlaw and mother-in-law of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners being father-in-law and mother-in-law of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23598 of 2023(2) dt.28-06-2023 2/2 complainant have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the complaint it would manifest that no specific allegation is alleged against the petitioners rather the allegations are general and omnibus in nature. Learned counsel further submits that whenever a dispute arises between the husband and wife, entire family members are implicated. It is next submitted that husband of the complainant is in custody.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Trial No. 2243 of 2022 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1274 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T