Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23985 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2024 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Chandan Kumar S/O Mahendra Kumar @ Tuntun Kumar R/O VillageChakhveev, Police Station- Musarigharari, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2),127(1),303(2),352,351(2),76 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that while she was planting pond in her field when petitioner came and tried to molest her, on alarm the petitioner assaulted her and snatched her mangalsutra, ear tops etc. and even threatened her by putting gun on her neck. Further, the petitioner fled when villagers came, but in the evening, petitioner again came and vandalized the house of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23985 of 2025(2) dt.30-04-2025 2/2 informant.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that petitioner and informant are neighbours and there is a delay of four days in instituting the FIR as the occurrence is of 05.12.2024 and the FIR has been instituted on 09.12.2024, which cast an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Samastipur in connection with Musarigharari P. S. Case No.182 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T