Ravish Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Raukish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22831 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2025 Thana- PAKARIBARAW District- Nawada ====================================================== Ravish Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Raukish Kumar S/o Sharwan Yadav @ Shrawan Yadav @ Shrawan Kumar Resident of Village - Mosma, P.S.- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada, ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 317(2) and 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the F.I.R., informant got a secret information that some illegal sand mining activity was being committed by the accused persons including the petitioner. Upon which, informant proceeded for investigation and found that the accused persons were riding on a motorcycle without number plate and on seeing the police the accused persons left the motorcycle and managed to flee away. Upon search, the said

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22831 of 2026(4) dt.01-07-2026 2/3 motorcycle was found to be stolen for which F.I.R. was also registered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that petitioner has no concern neither with the motorcycle in question nor with the illegal mining of sand. Except the suspicion, there is nothing material against the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial. There is no chance of absconding of the petitioner or tampering with the evidence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and clean antecedent of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Nawada in connection with Pakaribarawan P.S. Case No. 336 of 2025,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22831 of 2026(4) dt.01-07-2026 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T