← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22086/2020rejected

Umesh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2020-09-21Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 22086 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- 235 Year- 2019 Thana-Nath Nagar (Madhusudanpur), District - Bhagalpur ===================================================

1. Umesh Paswan (Male), aged about 28 years

2. Gulsan Paswan (Male), aged about 25 years Both are S/o Dipo Paswan, Resident of village - Ganaura, Badarpur, P.S. Madhusudanpur, Dist. Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

=================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 21-09-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioners seek bail in connection with Nath Nagar (Madhusudanpur) P.S. Case No. 235 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 302, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of 6th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case due to family dispute. Further submission is that petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22086 of 2020(2) dt.21-09-2020 2/2 are languishing in jail custody since 22.01.2020 and 10.01.2020 respectively and they have no criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioners by contending that petitioners are named in the first information report and there is specific allegation against them in the first information report. Hence, this is not a fit case for bail.

Having considered the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners for bail is rejected. (Arvind Srivastava, J) Shailendra/- U T Note: This is certified to be the true typed copy of the original order.