← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22465/2025bail granted

Harishankar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-30Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22465 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2023 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Harishankar Kumar S/o Radhay Shyam Singh R/o Village- Raypur, P.SRunnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 280 of 2023, dated 27.05.2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(ii), 36 and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per allegation, 2689.5 litre of illicit liquor has been recovered from one container truck bearing Registration No. MH-14GD-7529 and two Bolero Pick-up Vans bearing Registration Nos. BR-10GB-2943 and BR-06GB-8320.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22465 of 2025(2) dt.30-04-2025 2/3 the possession of the petitioner and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court Below, in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 280 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.PC and on the following conditions:

(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22465 of 2025(2) dt.30-04-2025 3/3 court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) shoaib/- U T