← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24637/2019allowed

Deo Narayan Mahto @ Deo Narayan @ Gajadhar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-17Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24637 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2018 Thana- SAHIYARA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

DEO NARAYAN MAHTO @ DEO NARAYAN @ GAJADHAR MAHTO Son of Late Ramdev Mahto Resident of Village- Oralahiya, P.S.- Sahiyara, District- Sitamarhi.

2.

Sudhir Kumar Son of Gajadhar Mahto Resident of Village- Oralahiya, P.S.- Sahiyara, District- Sitamarhi.

3.

Ramesh Kumar Son of Gajadhar Mahto Resident of Village- Oralahiya, P.S.- Sahiyara, District- Sitamarhi.

4.

Mukesh Mahto Son of Hirdeo Narayan Mahto Resident of VillageOralahiya, P.S.- Sahiyara, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Sahiyara P.S. Case No. 214 of 2018 for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners, who are of clean antecedent, are innocent and have not committed any offence. In fact, there is general and omnibus allegation against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24637 of 2019(2) dt.17-04-2019 2/2 petitioners and no specific allegation is attributed to the petitioners. Earlier an F.I.R. being Sahiyara P.S. Case No. 122 of 2018 has been lodged by Kaushalya Devi against her husband, Shrawan Kumar Mahto and Dukhiya Devi along with others, which is evident from Annexure-2. Hence, the petitioners may be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioners in the event of their surrender within a period of four weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned I/c Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Sahiyara P.S. Case No. 214 of 2018 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T