Parwati Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4013 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21459 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Parwati Devi wife of Parmeshwar Dayal Singh, R/O Village- Hariharpur, P.O.- Hariharpur, P.S.-Bhawnathpur, District- Garhwa (Jharkhand) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Shri R.K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Human Resource Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. Sri Ram Bujaswan Choudhary, The Director (Secondary Education), Human Resource Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. Sri Sanjay Kumar, The Accountant General (A AND E), Bihar, Patna

4. Sri Parmeshwar Dayal Singh, son of Late Balmukund Singh

5. Smt. Sarita Devi, wife of Prameshwar Dayal Singh, Respondent No. 4 and 5 are resident of Village- Hariharpur, P.O.-Hariharpur, P.S.- Bhawnathpur, Distt.- Garhwa (Jharkhand) .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunita Kumari For the Accountant General : Kumar Priya Ranjan, with Miss Gunja ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 26-08-2015 Supplementary show cause is filed on behalf of the opposite parties.

The annexures of supplementary show cause reveal that the order has already been complied with. Although learned counsel, appearing for petitioner submits that uptill now, she has not verified the assertions made by the opposite parties in supplementary show cause but in my view, it is needless to keep this matter pending and accordingly, this petition stands disposed off.

Patna High Court MJC No.4013 of 2014 (11) dt.26-08-2015 2/2 However, if, after verification, the assertion, made by the opposite parties in supplementary show cause is found incorrect, the petitioner may take appropriate steps in accordance with law.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) A.K.V./- U