Sudhir Ravidas And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.27798 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -214 Year- 2017 Thana -JEHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ======================================================
1. Sudhir Ravidas, Son of Late Aklu Ravidas, Resident of Village- Harla, P.S.- Dhanarua, District- Patna.
2. Sakaldeep Kumar, Son of Shiv Charan Ravidas, Resident of VillageVistaul, P.S.- Jehanabad (Karauna O.P.), District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jehanabad (Karauna) P.S. Case No.214 of 2017 for allegedly having committed the offences under Sections 366A, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the girl in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has stated that she had left her home out of her sweet-will and reached her Mausi's place. There is no allegation of kidnapping against the petitioners or any one for that matter.
In view of the aforementioned facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27798 of 2017 (2) dt.01-07-2017 2/2 circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of `10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Jehanabad (Karauna) P.S. Case No.214 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T