← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23501/2014bail granted

Jitendra Kumar Singh @ Bhulan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2015-05-20Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23501 of 2014 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -288 Year- 2013 Thana -PIRO District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar Singh @ Bhulan Singh S/o Ram Ishwar Singh R/o Village Gachhal Rampur, P.S. Karakat, District Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ruby Devi, D/o Jitendra Kumar Singh @ Bhulan Singh, resident of village Keshwa, P.S. Piro, District Bhojpur .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate For the State : Dr. Ravindra Kumar, APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Harendra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 20-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State assisted by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under sections 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act registered in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 288 of 2013.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and this is the first such grievance raised since the parties were married five years ago. The petitioner expresses his willingness to keep the opposite party no.2 with due dignity and honour.

4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 appears

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23501 of 2014 (8) dt.20-05-2015 2/2 and also expresses willingness on her part to accompany with the petitioner if she is kept properly.

5. Pursuant to the order dated 29.04.2015, both parties are personally present and agree that they would be leaving the Court premises together, reiterating their commitment to resume their conjugal life in harmonious manner.

6. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner by order dated 28.08.2014 pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Piro P.S. Case No.288 of 2013 stands confirmed. However, in case a fresh complaint/F.I.R. of similar nature is filed by the opposite party no.2 against the petitioner at any time prior to conclusion of the trial, anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- U T