Uday Pratap Gupta @ Udai Pratao Gupta v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29486 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.29486 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -281 Year- 2016 Thana -SHIVSAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== UDAY PRATAP GUPTA @ UDAI PRATAO GUPTA, Son of late Sheopujan Sah, Resident of Village Alampur, Police Station- Baddi (O.P.), District- Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Sheosagar (Baddi) Police Station Case No. 281 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 342, 323, 147, 148, 149, 353, 307, 427 and 327 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner and no specific overt act is attributed to him rather the specific allegation of damaging the government property by iron rod has been leveled against the co-accused. The petitioner happens to be same villager has no concern with the alleged
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29486 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 occurrence. Hence, the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, deserves the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram at Rohtas, in connection with Sheosagar (Baddi) Police Station Case No. 281 of 2016, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438
(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T