Amar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23214 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2018 Thana- GANDHIMAIDAN District- Patna ====================================================== AMAR KUMAR Son of Late Chhote Yadav Resident of Salimpur Ahra, Gali No. 3, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gajanan Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant alleged that deceased was assaulted with sharp weapon but in the postmortem report it is mentioned that death occurred due to firearm injury.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned VIth Additional Sessions Judge, Patna in connection with Gandhi Maidan Police Station Case No. 167 of 2018 corresponding

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23214 of 2019(3) dt.26-06-2019 2/2 S.Tr. No. 579 of 2018, subject to the conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife. (II) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (III) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(IV) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T