← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23059/2025bail granted

Shila Sinha v. The Additional Chief Secretary, Vigilance Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2025-08-18Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23059 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-520 Year-2024 Thana- SIWAN CITY District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Shila Sinha Wife of Shri Vinod Kumar Sinha village- Usari, Ps- M H. Nagar, Dist- Siwan, At P/A- Residing at near Old Oriental English School, Nayi Basti Mahadeva, Ps- Siwan Muffasil (Mahadeva OP), Dist- Siwan 2.

Vinod Kumar Sinha son of Late Giriwar Dhari Sharan sinha village- Usari, Ps- M H. Nagar, Dist- Siwan, At P/A- Residing at near Old Oriental English School, Nayi Basti Mahadeva, Ps- Siwan Muffasil (Mahadeva OP), DistSiwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Vigilance Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Director General Vigilance Investigating Bureau, Govt. of Bihar, Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and Mr. Arvind Kumar, learned Special P.P. appearing on behalf of the Vigilance.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 173 and 3(5) of the BNS as well as Sections 7, 8 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and petitioner no. 2 has antecedent of two cases and the informant alleges that a video on YouTube is trending showing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23059 of 2025(4) dt.18-08-2025 2/3 that petitioners were taking bribe in lieu of giving copy of the Khatiyan.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case based on a YouTube video. It is further submitted that no person has come forward to institute an FIR against the petitioners alleging that they demanded bribe in lieu of giving the copy of the Khatiyan. It is next submitted that authenticity of the YouTube video has not been examined by the expert. It is also submitted that petitioners will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove their innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned Special P.P. appearing on behalf of the Vigilance opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Siwan

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23059 of 2025(4) dt.18-08-2025 3/3 Town P.S. Case No. 520 of 2024, Special Case No. 14 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T