← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28029/2017bail granted

Ambika Manjhi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-13Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28029 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -195 Year- 2016 Thana -MASRAKH District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Ambika Manjhi son of Late Sabha Manjhi. null

2. Amrawati Devi wife of Ambika Manjhi.

3. Pramila Devi,

4. Urmila Devi, both are D/o Ambika Manjhi.

5. Dipak Manjhi @ Dipak Kumar, son of Ambika Manjhi All are Resident of Village- Karan Kudariya, P.S. Mashrakh, District- Saran. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 195 of 2016 for the offences instituted under Sections 302, 201, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners is of committing murder of the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28029 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 present case. The petitioner no.1 is father-in-law of the deceased, petitioner no.2 is mother-in-law of the deceased, petitioner no.3 and petitioner no.4 are married Nanad of the deceased and petitioner no.5 is Dewar of the deceased. They are separate in mess and property from the husband of the deceased. the alleged occurrence has taken place after nine years of the marriage. On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 195 of 2016 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-8th, Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T