Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77656/2018disposed

Ranveer Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-02Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.77656 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-624 Year-2018 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ranveer Kumar Singh S/o Bhagya Narain Singh, R/o Phulwar, Gamhariya, P.S.- Banjariya, Distt.- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 624 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 399, 402, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-A)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Allegation is recovery of one loaded country made Katta from the possession of petitioner.

Considering the nature of allegation against petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

However, after six months of custody the petitioner would be enlarge on bail by the court below itself on furnishing

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77656 of 2018(2) dt.02-01-2019 2/2 bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Motihari, in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 624 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T