Anil Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20808 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2016 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Jamui ====================================================== Anil Das Son of Baijnath Das Resident of Village- Dokali, P.S.- Sono, District- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukeshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Sections 341/323/498A/494/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act. This is a case under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is husband of the victim girl. There is allegation of solemnization of second marriage also by the petitioner.

Considering the entire facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20808 of 2019(2) dt.01-05-2019 2/2 where the case is pending in connection with Jamui Mahila P.S. Case No.47 of 2016, with following conditions: (a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below having immovable property in his name.

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (C) The petitioner shall pay rupees two thousand and five hundred per month as maintenance to his wife and the amount shall be subject to the final result of the maintenance case brought by the wife. This amount shall be adjusted against any order of maintenance passed by the competent Court. If the petitioner would fail to pay the aforesaid amount to his wife, the Court-below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond of the petitioner. (Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T