Ramnath Ram And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17035 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -276 Year- 2016 Thana -TARAIYA District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Ramnath Ram, son of Late Vikrama Ram,

2. Lajwanti Devi, wife of Ramnath Ram, Resident of Village- Bagahi Harakhpur, Police Station- Taraiya District- Saran at Chapra.

3. Pushpa Devi @ Pushpa Kumari, wife of Ravindra Ram @ Ravi, Resident of Mohalla Marhura Sonarpatti, Police Station Maraura, District- Saran at Chapra.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 21-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 276 of 2016 registered for offence under section 366 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners have been indicted with kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence and have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17035 of 2017 (4) dt.21-06-2017 2/2 There is a property dispute between the parties. The victim in her statement recorded under section 164 Cr. P.C., has denied the complicity of the petitioners in the aforesaid offence. Though in the impugned order it has been mentioned that the victim before the Court has stated that the aforesaid statement was given under pressure, but the said statement before the learned lower Court i.e. 9th Additional Sessions Judge was itself given by the victim under pressure of her parents.

Petitioner nos. 2 and 3 happens to be lady.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Judicial Magistrate-IX, Saran at Chapra in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 276 of 2016, corresponding to G.R. No. 7660 of 2016, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) Mahesh/- U T