← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22540/2025bail granted

Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-27Mr. Justice S. B. P. Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22540 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Pramod Kumar S/o Kashi Ram, R/o Village- Manohar Nagar, P.S.- Merapur, Dist.- Farukhabad (U.P.).

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Swarnima, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Prohibition and Excise Sadar (Bhojpur) P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025 dated 08.02.2025 instituted for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution story, 2889 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from a truck near Daulatpur overbridge.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Petitioner is not the owner of the truck in question. Petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition. Petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2025. He lastly submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22540 of 2025(3) dt.27-05-2025 2/2 after completion of investigation, chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as petitioner's period under custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail after framing of charge, if not framed as yet. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise, Excise court No.-II, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Prohibition and Excise Sadar (Bhojpur) P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025, on further conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every fixed date and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond may be cancelled by the learned trial Court.

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Shahnawaz/- U T