Shobha Devi v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47485 of 2015 (2) dt.03-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47485 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2008 Thana -BALIA District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Shobha Devi, W/o Shankar Yadav, Resident of Village- Laldarwaza, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Munger.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 363, 365 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 39 of 2008.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event there is no specific overt act attributed to the petitioner except a vague and general accusation of conspiracy. The petitioner is a lady and claims clean criminal antecedent.
4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47485 of 2015 (2) dt.03-11-2015 petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 39 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions : (i) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(ii) The petitioner will be well represented on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U T