Patna High CourtC.R./106/2015dfd for non appearance

Mukul Kumar Pandey @Mukul Pandey v. Sri Indradeo Arya And ORS

2017-11-02Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Revision No.106 of 2015 ====================================================== Mukul Kumar Pandey @ Mukul Pandey Son of Late Ram Nagina Pandey Resident of Collectorate Chowk, Ujjain Tola, Bettiah, P.O. & P.S. - Bettiah, District - West Champaran at Bettiah.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. Sri Indradeo Arya Son of Late Jawala Prasad Arya.

2. Smt. Kaushlya Devi Wife of Late Jawala Prasad Arya Both residents of Mohalla - Purani Gudari Bettiah, P.O. & P.S. - Bettiah, District - West Champaran at Bettiah.

3. Sri Sanchit Rai Son of Late Ramdutt Rai

4. Rajesh Kumar Rai

5. Sudhir Kumar Rai Both Sons of Sri Sanchit Rai

6. Gunjan Rai

7. Prakash Rai Both minor sons of Sri Sanchit Rai through their father and natural guardian, Sri Sanchit Rai All residents of Village - Ganauli Tola, Singha Chapar, P.O. - Ganauli, P.S. - Bettiah Muffasil, District - West Champaran at Bettiah. .... .... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sangeeta Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02-11-2017 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has no instruction from the petitioner and as a matter of fact, petitioner has taken away his brief.

The office has reported that affidavit of jointness has not been filed as yet.

The previous order dated 06.10.2017 goes to show that on that very date also learned counsel of the petitioner had informed this court that he had no instruction of the petitioner.

Patna High Court C.R. No.106 of 2015 (6) dt.02-11-2017 2/2 Therefore, it appears that no one is appearing on behalf of the petitioner to press this revision petition and it appears to me that the petitioner has already lost his interest to pursue this revision petition.

Accordingly, this revision petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U