Raja Kumar @ Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Cr. Misc. No. 21358 of 2020 ====================================================== Raja Kumar @ Rahul Kumar, son of Kartik Mahto, resident of MohallaKahartoli, Gudri Road, Pokhara, P.O. & P.S.-Hajipur Town, District-Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .. ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Soni, Advocate For the Respondent State:

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-07-2020 Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar Soni, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State of Bihar. This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 476 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 323, 341, 504, 506, 379 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

On perusal of the First Information Report, it is evident that a petty quarrel between two children of two families had given rise to some altercation and subsequent scuffle. There is general and omnibus allegation of assault and snatching of certain valuables. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the background in which the occurrence had allegedly taken place, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner above named, in the event of his

arrest/surrender within six weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Hajipur at Vaishali, in Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 476 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the Police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

It is indicated that defect, if any, shall be removed within two months.

Since there is a lock down, the Court has considered it appropriate to adopt following procedure for communication of the present order :- (i) The order, which has been dictated during the course of the proceedings of virtual Court, shall be communicated to me on my e-mail I.D. by the Secretary. (ii) The corrected copy of the order shall be transmitted by me from my e-mail I.D. to the Secretary, which shall be treated to be the authentic copy of the order passed by

this Court today in the present proceeding.

(iii) Hard copy of the order, duly signed by me, shall be preserved in my residential-office for documentation and future use, if any.

(iv) Let a copy of the order be communicated to the learned Court below through e-mail or any other appropriate electronic mode by the Registry.

Let steps be taken by the Registry for uploading of the present order without compromising with the norms of social distancing.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U T