Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49148/2015bail granted

Kumar Kashyap v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-11-04Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49148 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1018 Year- 2010 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ======================================================

1. Kumar Kashyap, Son of Late Chaturbhuj Narayan, Resident of MohallaKrishna Nagar, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Ajit Pratap Singh, Son of Late Bansidhar Singh, Resident of Mihir Path, East Boring Canal Road, ,P.S.- Srikrishna Puri,District- Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M. Dayal (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 04-11-2015 Heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma for the petitioner and Mr. M. Dayal, APP, for the State.

Petitioner is the Branch Manager of Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. The complainant has alleged that without his consent, a life policy was assigned to him and two premiums amount in the sum of Rs. 1,050/- were deducted from his account. Contention of the petitioner is that the Branch Manager is not directly involved in assignment of insurance. Mr. Sharma, on instruction, states that the amount of premium has now been paid back to the account of the complainant.

In the event of arrest or surrender in the Court below within four weeks, the petitioner abovenamed is directed to be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49148 of 2015 (2) dt.04-11-2015 2/2 released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in Complaint Case No. 1018(C)/2010 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with the further following conditions:

(i) One of the bailers shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.

(ii) In case of framing of charge, the petitioner shall appear in person on each and every date fixed in the Court below. In case of default in doing so on two consecutive occasions without any cogent/satisfactory reason, the Trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U T