Ram Udgar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23272 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2022 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani ====================================================== RAM UDGAR SINGH S/O SRI VIJAY KUMAR SINGH Resident of Village- Bela Navtoli, P.S.- Babubarhi, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vaishnavi Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, the informant was returning from Delhi, on telephone he received information that in his house theft was committed. When he reached near house he saw lock of the house was broken and the articles were scattered in the house. It is further alleged that cash of Rs. 5,00,000/-, golden chain, Silver payal and other articles were missing and some articles as well as from his uncle house. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23272 of 2023(2) dt.12-07-2023 2/2 committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown person. He submitted that during investigation, the petitioner has been implicated in the present case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Dharmendra Kumar Yadav, which has no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been done. He is languishing in judicial custody since 04.02.2023. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Ladania P.S. Case No. 188 of 2022. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T