Rishi Singh @ Anuj Kumar Rathour v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24451 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-164 Year-2025 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Rishi Singh @ Anuj Kumar Rathour S/O Manoj Kumar Singh R/o Village Rathour Tola Purvari Telpa, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Avinash Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.164 of 2025, for allegedly having committed offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, instituted on the basis of the written report submitted by the informant, while he was busy at his milk parlour on 21.03.2025, all the accused persons named in the F.I.R. came there with arms and ammunitions and asked for Lassi. When the informant refused, they started using filthy language and assaulted the informant. The petitioner assaulted the informant on his head and all the accused persons also assaulted him due to which he suffered injuries.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24451 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 2/3
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and no such occurrence has taken place. It is submitted that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are baseless and even the doctor, who conducted the medical examination of the informant, has found the injuries to be simple in nature. The petitioner has got a clean antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a student studying in an Engineering College in Madhya Pradesh.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, it appears that the doctor has opined the injuries to be simple in nature and further the petitioner is a student studying in an engineering college in Madhya Pradesh.
7. Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.164 of 2025, subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24451 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 3/3 conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. with a further condition that:- The learned court concerned shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court concerned shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Ritesh Kumar, J.) Sanjay/- U T